Horse racing has a long and storied history, with some sources tracing the sport back to the ancient Greek Olympics. But in recent years, the question of whether or not horse racing is considered cruel has come to the forefront. While some people argue that horse racing is a traditional sport that is part of our history, others point to the potential for horses to be mistreated and overworked. In this article, we will explore both sides of the debate to answer the question: Is horse racing considered cruel?
Pros of Horse Racing
Economic Benefits
One of the main arguments in favor of horse racing is the economic benefits it provides. According to the American Horse Council, horse racing generates an estimated $102 billion in economic activity and supports 1.5 million jobs in the United States. Furthermore, the industry generates an estimated $28 billion in taxes. These economic benefits are not just limited to horse racing—they also extend to jobs that are related to the industry, such as breeders, grooms, trainers and veterinarians.
Horse Welfare
Proponents of horse racing argue that the sport is not cruel and that horse welfare is taken very seriously. The industry is heavily regulated and has a number of measures in place to ensure the safety and welfare of the horses. This includes stringent drug testing, regular veterinary examinations, and the implementation of the Equine Injury Database, which tracks horse injuries in order to improve safety on the track.
The Sport Itself
For many people, horse racing is an exciting and thrilling sport. It is a fast-paced, adrenaline-pumping event that draws in millions of spectators every year. Furthermore, it gives horses an opportunity to display their natural athleticism and spirit, and it is a great way to bond with horses.
Cons of Horse Racing
Risks of Injury and Death
One of the main arguments against horse racing is the risk of injury or death associated with the sport. According to The New York Times, an average of 24 horses a week suffer fatal injuries on American racetracks. Furthermore, horses can suffer from a variety of injuries, from fractures to tendon tears to broken bones.
Treatment of Horses
Another argument against horse racing is the potential for horses to be mistreated. Horses can be overworked, given drugs to enhance performance, and kept in substandard living conditions. These practices can lead to serious health issues for the horses and can potentially be cruel.
Animal Welfare Issues
From an animal welfare perspective, horse racing can be considered cruel. Horses are kept in cramped stalls, and they are subject to intense training and racing schedules. Furthermore, horses are often bred for racing, and those that do not perform well can be sent to slaughterhouses.
Arguments For and Against Horse Racing
- For: Horse racing generates economic benefits and provides jobs. It is heavily regulated and many measures are in place to ensure the safety and welfare of the horses.
- Against: There is a risk of injury and death associated with the sport, and horses can be mistreated and overworked.
- For: Horse racing is an exciting and thrilling sport that gives horses an opportunity to display their natural athleticism and spirit.
- Against: From an animal welfare perspective, horse racing can be considered cruel. Horses are kept in cramped stalls, and they are subject to intense training and racing schedules.
Animal Welfare Organizations’ Views on Horse Racing
Many animal welfare organizations are firmly against horse racing, citing the potential for horses to be mistreated and overworked. The Humane Society of the United States, for example, has spoken out against horse racing and has called for an end to the sport. Similarly, the ASPCA has voiced strong opposition to horse racing, stating that the sport “places unnecessary stress on horses” and has called for stronger regulations to protect the horses.
Legislation to Regulate Horse Racing
In response to the concerns raised by animal welfare organizations, some states have passed legislation to regulate horse racing. For example, California has passed a law that requires all horses to be tested for drugs before and after every race. Furthermore, the state has also banned certain drugs and has implemented a rule that states horses must be given a rest period between races. Other states, such as New York, have also passed similar legislation.
Conclusion
The debate over whether or not horse racing is cruel is a complex one, and there are arguments to be made on both sides. On the one hand, horse racing provides economic benefits and can be an exciting and thrilling sport. On the other hand, there is a risk of injury and death associated with the sport, and horses can be mistreated and overworked. Animal welfare organizations have voiced strong opposition to horse racing, and some states have implemented legislation to regulate the sport. In the end, it is up to each individual to decide whether or not they believe horse racing is cruel.
References
American Horse Council. (2020). Economic Impact of the Horse Industry. Retrieved from https://www.horsecouncil.org/economic-impact-horse-industry/
The Humane Society of the United States. (n.d.). Horse Racing. Retrieved from https://www.humanesociety.org/resources/horse-racing
The New York Times. (2020). How Many Horses Die at Racetracks Every Year? Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/06/17/sports/horse-racing-death-toll.html
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. (n.d.). Horse Racing. Retrieved from https://www.aspca.org/animal-cruelty/horse-racing