A dark horse president is a candidate who unexpectedly wins an election despite not having been seen as a likely winner. This term is most commonly used in politics to describe an underdog who unexpectedly gains power and influence. Dark horse presidents have become increasingly more common in recent years as the political landscape has grown more divided and unpredictable.
The Origin of the Term
The term “dark horse” first originated in the 19th century, when the phrase was used to describe a racehorse that had not been seen on the track before the race. The term has since been adopted to describe a political candidate that comes out of nowhere to win an election despite not having been seen as a likely winner.
Examples of Dark Horse Presidents
There have been several examples of dark horse presidents in recent history. In the United States, the most notable example is Donald Trump, who won the 2016 election despite facing an uphill battle against a well-funded and well-liked opponent. In the United Kingdom, Theresa May was an unexpected victor in the 2017 election, despite being seen as a longshot.
The Advantages of Being a Dark Horse President
Dark horse presidents often have a few advantages over more established candidates. For one, their lack of notoriety can help them to fly under the radar, avoiding the intense scrutiny that more visible candidates face. This can help them to stay focused on their message and avoid getting bogged down in political side-show debates. Additionally, dark horse candidates can often tap into powerful grassroots support that is overlooked by more established candidates.
The Disadvantages of Being a Dark Horse President
It can be difficult for a dark horse president to gain the trust and support of the public, as they are often seen as an unknown quantity. Additionally, dark horse presidents may lack the support of powerful political organizations, making it difficult for them to get their message across. Additionally, dark horse presidents may struggle to gain the attention of the media, who are often more interested in covering the more established candidates.
The Role of the Media
The media plays a crucial role in determining who is seen as a viable candidate and who is seen as a dark horse. The media often focuses on the most visible candidates, ignoring lesser-known candidates who may be equally as qualified. This can create an environment in which dark horse candidates are overlooked and unable to gain the support of the public.
The Role of the Voters
Ultimately, it is the voters who decide who the dark horse president will be. Voters have the power to choose the candidate who best fits their needs, regardless of the media’s coverage of the candidates. In recent years, voters have increasingly chosen dark horse candidates, showing that the public is open to unexpected candidates who may be able to bring fresh perspectives and new solutions to the table.
Dark horse presidents have become increasingly more common in recent years, as the political landscape has become more unpredictable. Dark horse presidents can have a few advantages, such as avoiding intense scrutiny and tapping into powerful grassroots support, but they can also face challenges such as gaining the trust of the public and gaining the attention of the media. Ultimately, it is up to the voters to decide who will be the dark horse president.